A new look at dermatology: The complex effects of sunlight
Dermatological research is on the threshold of a fundamental reassessment. New findings question the long-standing paradigm about the harmfulness of solar radiation and reveal the complex interactions of various components of the light spectrum with human skin. Let's dive into the depth of this issue.
1. Limits of laboratory studies: Only part of the story
"UVA has been shown to be mutagenic in cultured cells."
This statement reveals a fundamental problem: in vitro studies cannot replicate the complexity of a living organism. Isolated cells lack the sophisticated defense mechanisms of the human body and interactions with other components of solar radiation.
2. Inappropriate model organisms: False analogies
"Inducing skin cancers in hairless albino mice."
The use of genetically modified nocturnal rodents to study the effect of UV radiation on human skin is methodologically problematic. These organisms are fundamentally different from humans both genetically and evolutionarily.
3. Epidemiological data: Context is key
"More significantly, a causal relationship between artificial UVA baths for cosmetic or medical purposes and a significant increase in human melanomas has recently been epidemiologically demonstrated."
Epidemiological data can indicate trends but cannot conclusively prove causality. In addition, we are talking about artificial sources of UV radiation, not natural sunlight.
4. Complexity of solar radiation: More than the sum of its parts
"Much of our knowledge of the effects of solar radiation comes from monochromatic UV experiments. Subsequently, additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions between different wavelengths of solar radiation have been largely overlooked."
This admission is pivotal and opens the door to a new understanding of the effects of solar radiation.
5. The protective potential of infrared radiation: A new view of the solar spectrum
A study published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology (Menezes et al., 1998) provides breakthrough findings on the protective effects of incoherent near-infrared (NIR) radiation against the toxic effect of UV radiation on human dermal fibroblasts.
6. Negative influence of blue light: Another factor to consider
Recent research shows that blue light, whether from the sun or from digital devices, can have negative effects on the skin. It has been found that it can:
• Increase the production of free radicals in the skin
• Accelerate the skin aging process
• Cause hyperpigmentation
• Disrupt the skin's natural circadian rhythm
These findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach to skin protection that takes into account not only UV radiation, but also other components of the light spectrum.
Conclusion: Time for a holistic approach
It is clear that the current view of dermatology on the effect of sunlight on human skin requires a radical rethinking. The key insight is that UV radiation never occurs alone in nature. It is always part of the complex solar spectrum, which includes visible light, infrared radiation and other components.
We need a holistic approach that takes into account:
• The complex nature of solar radiation and the interaction between its various components
• Adaptation and protection mechanisms of human skin
• The role of sunlight in the overall health of the organism
• Individual genetic and environmental factors
• Influence of modern lifestyle and exposure to artificial lighting
It's time to stop demonizing the sun and start exploring its complex role in our health. We may find that nature has equipped us with a sophisticated system of interactions with the various components of the light spectrum - a system that we have so far overlooked because of the simplistic view of solar radiation. The future of dermatology lies in understanding and harnessing these complex interactions to promote skin health.
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.